<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CO2 &#038; Expansion Chamber vs HPA</title>
	<link>http://www.paintballskewl.com/index.php/2007/09/21/co2-expansion-chamber-vs-hpa/</link>
	<description>Paintball, Woodsball, Speedball, Scenario Paintball - It's all about 280fps!</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Paintball Guns</title>
		<link>http://www.paintballskewl.com/index.php/2007/09/21/co2-expansion-chamber-vs-hpa/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Paintball Guns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.paintballskewl.com/index.php/2007/09/21/co2-expansion-chamber-vs-hpa/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>HPA is just an overall better choice.  It's worth throwing down the extra cash if you plan on playing the next year or more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HPA is just an overall better choice.  It&#8217;s worth throwing down the extra cash if you plan on playing the next year or more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
